US can curb carbon emissions while boosting oil production - university study
The US should accelerate efforts to pursue carbon capture and storage (CCS) in combination with enhanced oil recovery (EOR), a practice that could increase domestic oil production while significantly curbing emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), according to a report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Texas at Austin.
For decades the oil industry has used CO2 to extract oil from mature fields, often relying on purchased CO2 from natural sources, report writers said. The idea of seeking CO2 from industrial sources, such as coal- and natural gas-fired electricity plants, has gained currency because of public concerns about carbon dioxide emissions.
However, widespread adoption of combining enhanced oil recovery with carbon capture and storage faces major hurdles, including development of infrastructure, regulation and economic incentives to manage supply and demand of CO2, the report said.
The report, "Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Accelerating the Deployment of Carbon Capture and Sequestration," is the result of a symposium conducted by the MIT Energy Initiative and the Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas. It contends the US can overcome these obstacles with sustained research and policy leadership.
According to the report, the potential for storage of carbon emissions through enhanced oil recovery is vast. Scientists believe the principal zones for combining EOR and CCS could accommodate 3,500 gigawatt-years-equivalent of CO2 from coal power plants.
This represents about 15 years of current total output of CO2 from US coal plants. Recent research suggests the potential for even greater capacity in the Permian Basin of West Texas, the report said.
As a tool for enhanced oil recovery, CO2 injected underground could boost domestic oil production by as much as 3mn bpd by 2030, according to one estimate, an increase of more than 50% over current levels. Such a boost to US energy security would simultaneously help reduce the country's carbon footprint.
In a summary for policymakers, Ernest J. Moniz, director of the MIT Energy Initiative, and Scott W. Tinker, director of the Bureau of Economic Geology, made the case for an organized national CO2-EOR program using anthropogenic CO2 to "kick-start larger-scale carbon sequestration in the US and meet sequestration needs for a significant period if CO2 emissions pricing is introduced."
Use of anthropogenic CO2 for EOR has the potential, said the co-authors, to contribute to domestic energy production while accommodating national carbon sequestration needs "for at least a couple of decades, quite possibly more."
Given the rough equivalence between the amount of CO2 the energy industry needs for oil recovery and the amount produced by coal-fired electricity plants, the authors advocate "a serious look at scaling up CO2-EOR with government support."
Government support will be critical in part because of the complex factors that have to come together to facilitate EOR, including regulatory changes and development of a new pipeline system to get CO2 from industrial sources to oil-field sinks. First-mover CCS projects also face high financial hurdles requiring some form of financial incentives, the authors said.
The authors strongly urge the Department of Energy to implement a comprehensive research and development program that
- Supports ongoing research on the science and systems of CO2 storage as it relates to EOR.
- Provides a framework for the value propositions that will make CO2-EOR feasible for power plant, pipeline, and EOR operators and for the government.
- Puts forward principles for resolving regulatory issues.
- Maps out a phased implementation for CO2-EOR.
A copy of the full report, which was released based on work begun in 2010, can be found here.
Comments