February 2010


Implement a constrained optimal control in a conventional level controller - Part 2

Novel tuning method enables a conventional PI controller to explicitly handle the three important operational constraints of a liquid level loop in an optimal manner as well as copes with a broad range of level control from tight to averaging control

Lee, J. W., LG Chem, Ltd.; Lee, Y., GS-Caltex Corp.; Shin, J., LG Chem.

Part 1 of this article outlined the methodology. This part will discuss PI controller design for tightest constraint control and provide some examples. PI controller design for tightest constraint control. For a level loop being operated near the constraint, it is necessary to control the loop on the tightest possible constraint, the so-called "tightest constraint control": • For a given Hmax (or Q'o max), the PI controller for the tightest constraint control with respect to Q'o max (or Hmax) can be designed using either where t = 0.404. In this case, the tightest available Qo max is 1.3606 Qi or equivalently min 0.404. • For a given (Q'o max, Hmax) set

Log in to view this article.

Not Yet A Subscriber? Here are Your Options.

1) Start a FREE TRIAL SUBSCRIPTION and gain access to all articles in the current issue of Hydrocarbon Processing magazine.

2) SUBSCRIBE to Hydrocarbon Processing magazine in print or digital format and gain ACCESS to the current issue as well as to 3 articles from the HP archives per month. $409 for an annual subscription*.

3) Start a FULL ACCESS PLAN SUBSCRIPTION and regain ACCESS to this article, the current issue, all past issues in the HP Archive, the HP Process Handbooks, HP Market Data, and more. $1,995 for an annual subscription.  For information about group rates or multi-year terms, contact email Peter Ramsay or call +44 20 3409 2240*.

*Access will be granted the next business day.

Related Articles

From the Archive



{{ error }}
{{ comment.comment.Name }} • {{ comment.timeAgo }}
{{ comment.comment.Text }}