August 2009

Columns

HP Control: APC designs for minimum maintenance—Part 3

This is the third in a series of three editorials about designing advanced process control (APC) applications for an environment of little to no maintenance. Having lamented for years about APC applic..

Friedman, Y. Z., Petrocontrol

This is the third in a series of three editorials about designing advanced process control (APC) applications for an environment of little to no maintenance. Having lamented for years about APC applications failing due to lack of maintenance, we have to accept that a personnel shortage is here to stay. If we want our APC applications to survive in a minimum-maintenance environment we have to make them as robust as possible. My June editorial proposed design rule 1: Avoid cluttering the multivariable predictive controller (MVPC) control matrix. Associate each control variable (CV) with one, or a maximum of two manipulated variables (MVs). The July editorial continued with rule 2: Avoid near

Log in to view this article.

Not Yet A Subscriber? Here are Your Options.

1) Start a FREE TRIAL SUBSCRIPTION and gain access to all articles in the current issue of Hydrocarbon Processing magazine.

2) SUBSCRIBE to Hydrocarbon Processing magazine in print or digital format and gain ACCESS to the current issue as well as to 3 articles from the HP archives per month. $409 for an annual subscription*.

3) Start a FULL ACCESS PLAN SUBSCRIPTION and regain ACCESS to this article, the current issue, all past issues in the HP Archive, the HP Process Handbooks, HP Market Data, and more. $1,995 for an annual subscription.  For information about group rates or multi-year terms, contact email Peter Ramsay or call +44 20 3409 2240*.

*Access will be granted the next business day.

Related Articles

From the Archive

Comments

Comments

{{ error }}
{{ comment.comment.Name }} • {{ comment.timeAgo }}
{{ comment.comment.Text }}